MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_01C62289.7E1B4C60" This document is a Single File Web Page, also known as a Web Archive file. If you are seeing this message, your browser or editor doesn't support Web Archive files. Please download a browser that supports Web Archive, such as Microsoft Internet Explorer. ------=_NextPart_01C62289.7E1B4C60 Content-Location: file:///C:/6D15DE0C/HarvardTransgenderLawSyll05.html.htm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
<=
span
style=3D'font-family:"Lucida Sans Unicode"'> &n=
bsp;  =
; =
SEMINAR:
TRANSGENDER LAW
Wed.
10:15-12:15
Mr. D=
ean
Spade, Esq. &n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp; Janet Halley
Telep=
hone:
212.420.8748 &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; Hauser 424
Office
Hours: Wed. 12:15-1:45 &nb=
sp; =
<=
/span>Telephone 617 496 0182
E-Mai=
l: dean@srlp.org=
=
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; Office Hours: TBA
&n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp;  =
; Email:
jhalley@law.harvard.edu
Assistant to Dean Spade and Janet Halley for this course:
Terry Cyr, Hauser 406, tcyr@law.harvard.edu
&n=
bsp;  =
; <=
/span>SEMINAR
SYLLABUS
Description
This seminar explores aspects o=
f the
legal regulation of gender identity and expression. The seminar will pursue two main
goals. The first goal is to r=
ead
and discuss the formal “black letter” law found in judicial
decisions, statutes, and administrative rules. The second goal is to introd=
uce
and discuss concepts from a variety of disciplines that can be used be
understand and interrogate the deeper ideological and political determinant=
s of
the legal materials we are reading. Among the questions on which we will fo=
cus
throughout the semester are these:
How have sexuality and gender been defined, posed and addressed as a
problem in and for the
Topics to be discussed include =
the
scope and limits of “privacy” as an organizing principle in U.S.
sex law; legal efforts to define and distinguish sex, gender and sexuality,
sexual acts, gender identities and expressions, and sexual identities
("homosexuality," "heterosexuality," and
"bisexuality"); sex, gender, and the criminal justice system; gen=
der,
sexuality, surveillance and citizenship; law, gender, sexuality and violenc=
e;
gender identity, sexuality and the legal construction of the body.
Requirements
The readin=
gs for
this semester will be available in the course reader or through internet li=
nks
provided to students. Student=
s are
expected to read all the assigned material in advance of each seminar sessi=
on,
attend every seminar meeting, and participate actively in seminar discussio=
n.
In addition to 1-2 page critical responses to the weekly readings, students
will write and, toward the end of the semester, present a 20-25 page seminar
paper in the on a topic to be chosen in consultation with Mr. Spade. The seminar paper is a research-ba=
sed project,
which should demonstrate a mastery of the relevant legal and scholarly
literatures on your chosen topic.
Seminar paper topics must be developed by the students and approved =
by
the instructor no later than March 15.&nbs=
p;
The weekly response papers must be circulated to Mr. Spade and your
classmates by email before 1pm on the Tuesday before class. The weekly response papers account =
for
20% of the final grade, and the seminar paper accounts for the remaining 80=
%.
Required
Students
should purchase one book, That’s Revolting: Queer Strategies for
Resisting Assimilation (ed. Mattilda Sycamore), at the Law Coop, and pi=
ck
up the course reader at the
Reading
Questions
When
engaging the readings, assigned each week, whether cases, articles, policie=
s or
personal narratives, in addition to your other inquiries it will assist you=
in
preparing for class discussion if you consider the following questions:
Ø
How
does the writer understand gender?
Ø
How
does the writer define or explain gender variance or trans identities?
Ø
What
does the writer think should be done about the concerns ze is identifying, =
both
immediately and more broadly? What should the world look like for this
writer?
SCHEDULE
February 1: Examining
Categories, Identifying Gendered Subjects
 = ; Before we can begin to investigate arguments about the law’s regulation or liberation of gender identity and gender expression, let’s examine so= me different theoretical perspectives on sex, gender, and sexuality. These will provide a backdrop for discussing how the courts, legislatures, and critical thinkers we hear from later understand sexuality and gender in order to support their positions.<= o:p>
 =
; &n=
bsp;
 =
; Course
Reader:
Eskridge and Hunter, Pages 537-=
634 (please
be sure to read D’Emilio, MacKinnon, Rubin, Crewnshaw, material about
Foucault,
&n=
bsp;  =
;
NOTE:
The packet of
readings for the first class will be available from Terry Cyr in Hauser 406=
.
February 8: Intersectionality a=
nd
Strategy
In
addition to examining how sexuality and gender are understood by advocates,
activists, courts, and policy makers, we will also be reading legal and soc=
ial
movement texts with an eye to how people engaged in movements for legal rig=
hts
or liberation strategize. We =
will
be asking critical questions about how the legal rights strategies we explo=
re
prioritize various issues and populations and marginalize others, and how
discussions about the limits of legal reform and other
“incremental” strategies emerge. These readings provide a backdrop =
for
those discussions, which will be central to our inquiry in every subsequent
class session.
&n=
bsp;
&n=
bsp; Course
Reader:
&=
nbsp; Kimberle
Crenshaw “Mapping the Margins” (excerpted in last week’s
reading, review for this week)
&=
nbsp; Chela
Sandoval, “
&=
nbsp; Roderick
A. Ferguson, Aberrations in Black: Toward a Queer of Color Critique,
Pages 1-29
&n=
bsp; Optional
&n=
bsp; &=
nbsp; Angela
Y. Davis, Are Prisons Obsolete? Introduction: Prison Reform or Prison
Abolition? P. 1-20
February 15: Beyond Pink and
Blue: Breaking the Rules of B=
inary
Gender
&n=
bsp; Syc=
amore:
Pages 177-186
&n=
bsp; Cou=
rse
Reader:
&n=
bsp;  =
; <=
/span>Lucas Rosa v. Park West Bank & Tru=
st
Co., 214 F.3d 213 (2000)
&n=
bsp;  =
; <=
/span>Mary
Dunlap, “The Constitutional Rights of Sexual Minorities: A Crisis of =
the
Male/Female Dichotomy,” 30
Excerpts from My Gender Work=
book by Kate Bornstein
&n=
bsp;  =
; <=
/span>Monster
Trans by Boots Potential (at www.makezine.org/boots.html)
Excerpts from Morty DiamondR=
17;s Inside
Out: FTM and Beyond
Excerpts from Read My Lips=
u> by
Riki Wilchins
February 22: Transgender Identi=
ties
and Medical Regulation
&n=
bsp;
&n=
bsp; Cou=
rse
Reader:
&n=
bsp;  =
; <=
/span>Dwight
B. Billings and Thomas Urban, The Socio-Medical Construction of
Transsexualism: An Interpretation and Critique, 29 Social Problems 266, 276 (1982)
&n=
bsp;  =
; <=
/span>HBIGDA
standards
&n=
bsp;  =
; <=
/span>DSM
IV excerpt on Gender Identity Disorder
Sample Birth Certificate Statut=
es
from Across the
&n=
bsp;  =
; <=
/span>
&n=
bsp;  =
; Cases
(please view on Westlaw)
&n=
bsp;  =
; <=
/span>Oiler v. Winn-Dixie, No. 00-3114, 2002
In
re Guido, 1
Misc.3d 825, 771 N.Y.S.2d 789 [
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; MT
v. JT, 355
A.2d 204, 211 (N.J. 1976).
March 1: Is Gender Identity Dis=
crimination
Disability Discrimination?
&n=
bsp; Syc=
amore:
Pages 189-206
&n=
bsp; Cou=
rse
Reader:
&n=
bsp;  =
; Jean Doe v.
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; =
Jane
Doe v.
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; =
Adrienne L. Hiegel, “Sexu=
al
Exclusions: The Americans with Disabilities Act as a Moral Code,” 94
Colum. L. Rev. 1451 (1994) (excerpt)
&n=
bsp;  =
; Resisting
Medicine, Remodeling Gender, by Dean Spade
Excerpts from Eli Clare’s=
Exile
and Pride: Disability, Queerness, and Liberation
Essay by
March 8: Is Gender Identity Discrimination Sex Discrimination? Is transphobia a feminist issue?
 =
; &n=
bsp; Course Reader:
&nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; Janice Raymond “The Transsexual Empire” (excerpt) &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
 =
; &n=
bsp;  =
; Sandy
Stone “The Empire Strikes Back” (excerpt)
 =
; &n=
bsp; &=
nbsp;
 =
; &n=
bsp;
 =
; &n=
bsp; Cases (please view on Westlaw)<=
span
style=3D'mso-bidi-font-weight:bold;mso-bidi-font-style:italic'>
 =
; &n=
bsp;  =
; Ulane
v. Eastern Airlines, 742 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir.1984)
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; Price
Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490
 =
; &n=
bsp;
 =
; &n=
bsp; In
Class Video: “Boy I Am”
Unit II: The Framing =
of
“LGBT” Legal Rights Struggles
 =
; This
section will introduce the primary legal issues that have been prioritized =
in
the current framing of “LGBT” legal rights by the central
organizations funded to engage in legal advocacy for the last couple decade=
s. We will explore some of these cent=
ral
“gay agenda” items, examining the implications for trans people,
questioning the reality of “trans inclusion,” and exploring
critiques of the priorities of this agenda.
March 15: “Same-Sex” Marriage and State
Regulation of Sexuality, Gender and Family Structure
&n=
bsp;  =
;
&n=
bsp;  =
; Sycamore:
Pages 87-93
&n=
bsp;  =
;
&n=
bsp;  =
; Course
Reader:
&n=
bsp;  =
; <=
/span>“Is
Gay Marriage Anti-Black?” by Kenyon Farrow
&n=
bsp; &=
nbsp; “<=
st1:PlaceName
w:st=3D"on">Washington
&n=
bsp;  =
; <=
/span>Exce=
rpts
from The Nation Magazine’s Marriage Issue
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; “Holy
Matrimony!” by Lisa Duggan
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; Lambda
Legal’s “Leading the Charge for Marriage”
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; Ian Barnard, “Fuck Commun=
ity or
Why I Support Gay Bashing.”
&n=
bsp;  =
; Cases
(please view on Westlaw)
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; MT
v. JT, 355 A.2=
d 204,
205 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1976) (previously assigned, review for class=
)
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; In
Re Estate of Gardiner,
273
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; Goodridge
v. Department of Public Health, 2003 WL 22701313 (Mass.2003)
&n=
bsp;  =
; &=
nbsp;
&n=
bsp;  =
; Optional:
Pop Quiz on Transracial and
International Adoption by Emi Koyama (http://eminism.org/=
readings/adoption-quiz.html)
A Critique of Intercountry Adop=
tion
by Lee Sam-Dol (h=
ttp://www.transracialabductees.org/politics/samdolcritique.html)
Daly v. Daly, 715 P.2d 56 (
J.L.S. v. D.K.S., 1997
&n=
bsp;  =
; B.
v. B., 184 A.2d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
&n=
bsp;  =
; Agai=
nst
Love, Laura Kipnis (excerpt)
March 22: Sodomy, Decriminalization, and the Limits of
&n=
bsp;  =
;
&n=
bsp;  =
; Sycamore:
Pages 65-71
&n=
bsp;  =
;
&n=
bsp;  =
; Course
Reader:
&n=
bsp;  =
; <=
/span>Eskridge
and Hunter: Pages 42-74, 91-98
&n=
bsp;  =
; <=
/span>“Our
Biggest Victory Yet,” Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund (2004).=
&n=
bsp;  =
; <=
/span>“Freedom
in a Regulatory State:
&n=
bsp;  =
; Cases
(please view on Westlaw)
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; Williams
v. Attorney General of
April 5: Queers, Hate Violence,=
and
Criminal “Justice” &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p;
&n=
bsp;  =
; Course
Reader:
&n=
bsp;  =
; Instead of Prisons: A Handbook for Abolitionists (exc=
erpts)
&n=
bsp;  =
; Manning
Marable, Racism, Prisons, and the Future of Black
&n=
bsp;  =
; Lisa
Crooms, "Everywhere There's War": A Racial Realist's Reconsiderat=
ion
of Hate Crimes Statutes
&n=
bsp;  =
; Local
Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act Statement by Mara Keisling
&n=
bsp;
&n=
bsp; Skim
these websites before class:
&n=
bsp;  =
; Human
Rights Campaign =
http://www.hrc.org/Template.cfm?Section=3DHate_Crimes1&Template=3D/Tagg=
edPage/TaggedPageDisplay.cfm&TPLID=3D52&ContentID=3D27964
&n=
bsp;  =
; Remembering
Our Dead www.rememberingourd=
ead.org
April 12: Gender Expression and Identity in t=
he
Context of Prisons and Policing
&n=
bsp; Syc=
amore:
Pages 97-112
&n=
bsp; Cou=
rse
Reader:
Gendered Crime & Punishment: Strategies to Protect Transgender,
Gender Variant & Intersex People in
“Trapped” in Sing Sing:
Transgendered Prisoners Caught in the Gender Binarism by Darren Rosenblum
(Optional)
Test=
imony
from the August 19, 2005 Prison Rape Elimination Commission Hearing
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p;
&= nbsp; &nbs= p; Cases (please view on Westlaw)<= o:p>
Farmer
v. Brennan, 511
Lucrecia v. Samples, 1995 WL 630016 (N.D=
. Cal.
Oct. 16, 1995)
Powell v. Schriver, =
175 F.3d 107, 115 (=
2d
Cir. 1999)
April 19: Social Welfare, Sex
Segregation, and Transgender Survival
&n=
bsp; Syc=
amore:
Pages 13-22
&n=
bsp; &=
nbsp; Course
Reader:
Why Welfare is a Queer Issue,
Transcript of Panel
Dean Spade, “Compliance is
Gendered: Transgender Survival and Social Welfare.”
&n=
bsp;  =
; <=
/span>NYC
CHR Compliance Guidelines for Local Law 3
&n=
bsp;  =
;
&n=
bsp;  =
; Cases (please view on Westlaw)<=
i>
J.D. v. Lackner, 80
Cal.App.3d 64 (CalApp. 1 Dist.1978)
Smith v. Rasmussen,<=
span
style=3D'font-family:"Lucida Sans Unicode";mso-bidi-font-style:italic'> 249 F.3d 755 (8th
Cir. 2001)
Hispanic
Aids Forum v. Bruno, 16 A.D.3d 294, 295, 792 N.Y.S.2d 43 (2005)
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; In
Class Video: “Toilet Training: Law and Order in the Bathroom”
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; Optional
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; Roderick A. Ferguson, Aberra=
tions
in Black: Toward a Queer of Color Critique, Pages 31-53.
April 26: Gender Outsiders and
Surveillance Culture
&n=
bsp; Cou=
rse
Reader:
Excerpts from Christian
Parenti’s The Soft Cage
Advo=
cacy
Materials about Real ID Act
Samp=
le Sex
Designation Change Policies, including SSA, Birth Certificate Statutes,
DMV’s, Passport
Mate=
rials
from the “Stop the Suspensions” Campaign
Inte=
roffice
Memorandum from William Yates, CIS, regarding applications filed by transge=
nder
individuals
&n=
bsp;  =
; In
Re Jose Mauricio Lovo-Lara (please find at
http://www.usdoj.gov/eoir/vll/intdec/vol23/3512%20.pdf)
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p;
|
11 |